Nebraska Supreme Court· 5/28/1999

State v. Franco

Citations

594 N.W.2d 633
257 Neb. 15
1999 Neb. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the legislature’s intent to make a forfeiture statute criminal necessitates application of double jeopardy without further inquiry
concluding that the legislature's intent to make a forfeiture statute criminal necessitates application of double jeopardy without further inquiry
holding that forfeiture proceedings are criminal in nature
protection provided by Nebraska’s double jeop ardy clause is coextensive with that provided by U.S. Constitution
superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. $18,000, 311 Neb. 621, 974 N.W.2d 290 (2022)
where Legislature specifically authorizes cumulative punish- ment under two statutes, regardless of whether those statutes proscribe “same” conduct under Blockburger, court’s task of statutory construction ends and cumulative punishment under such statutes in single trial may be imposed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.