Nebraska Supreme Court· 9/5/2003
State v. Mata
Citations
- 668 N.W.2d 448
- 266 Neb. 668
- 2003 Neb. LEXIS 147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no prejudice when jury observed defendant in shackles during jury selection
- resolution of ambiguity in invocation of right to remain silent question of fact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-01-30· cited 290×
- State v. BuckmanNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-03-05· cited 274×
- State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court· 2008-02-08· cited 248×
- State v. MolinaNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-05-05· cited 226×
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-03-18· cited 200×
- State v. ArchieNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-05-25· cited 199×
- State v. DixonNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-07-26· cited 198×
- State v. GalindoNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-10-09· cited 186×
- State v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-06-09· cited 177×
- State v. FeldhackerNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-01-02· cited 164×
- State v. BallNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-03-03· cited 154×
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-08-13· cited 135×
- State v. HesslerNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-11-30· cited 130×
- State v. VelaNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-01-08· cited 116×
- State v. BormannNebraska Supreme Court· 2010-01-29· cited 109×
- State v. BarfieldNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-11-03· cited 104×
- State v. RodriguezNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-01-19· cited 96×
- State v. GuntherNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-06-30· cited 86×
- State v. McKinneyNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-04-13· cited 85×
- State v. WarrinerNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-02-20· cited 65×
Cites
102 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 4,572×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1981-05-04· cited 875×
- Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 618×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.