Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 292 Neb. 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for alleged error to be considered by appellate court, appellant must both assign and specifically argue alleged error
  • for alleged error to be considered by appellate court, appellant must both assign and specifically argue alleged error
  • for alleged error to be considered by appellate court, appellant must both assign and specifically argue alleged error
  • for alleged error to be considered by appellate court, appellant must both assign and specifically argue alleged error
  • where Nebraska Evidence Rules commit evidentiary question at issue to discretion of trial court, appellate court reviews admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.