Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 10/26/2016
Scott v. State
Citations
- 148 A.3d 72
- 230 Md. App. 411
- 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- departing from Bowman and holding, post-Monge, that insufficient evidence does not prohibit retrial in a habitual offender proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eyler, Wright, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 1,657×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. BallSupreme Court· 1896-05-25· cited 1,376×
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-06-23· cited 1,032×
- Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1981-05-04· cited 875×
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 864×
- Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 726×
- New York State Club Assn., Inc. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 718×
- Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 610×
- Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-11-24· cited 398×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.