Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 148 A.3d 72
  • 230 Md. App. 411
  • 2016 Md. App. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • departing from Bowman and holding, post-Monge, that insufficient evidence does not prohibit retrial in a habitual offender proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eyler, Wright, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.