Skip to main content

State v. McKay

Citations

  • 723 N.W.2d 644
  • 15 Neb. Ct. App. 169
  • 2006 WL 786461
  • 2006 Neb. App. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court had discretion to grant the state's request to reopen following the defendant’s motion for discharge but noting that when the state seeks to reopen in -order -to make a prima facie case, then a finding of abuse of discretion becomes more likely
  • affirming trial court’s decision to permit State to withdraw its rest because State was alerted to omission in proof by defendant’s motion, not by court
  • “Also important [to the finding of an abuse of discretion] was the underlying conclusion that the evidence adduced by the State prior to resting was, in fact, insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Inbody, Irwin, Cassel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.