Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 10/12/1979
State v. Nash
Citations
- 119 N.H. 728
- 407 A.2d 365
- 1979 N.H. LEXIS 377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant’s statement that “he thought he had better talk to an attorney” constituted a sufficient invocation of his right to counsel
- statement by accused “ ‘he thought he had better talk to an attorney’ ” was sufficient to invoke right to counsel
- statement by accused \`he thought he had better talk to an attorney'\ was sufficient to invoke right to counsel
- failure to obtain a valid waiver would prevent the police from conducting further interrogation
- promise made by-police to provide defendant with medical assistance if he admitted rape
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 584×
- People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-09-29· cited 236×
- People v. KruegerIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-10-17· cited 88×
- State v. BenoitSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-02-06· cited 71×
- Daniel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1982-04-28· cited 62×
- United States v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-02-24· cited 60×
- State v. Kevin LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2017-03-10· cited 44×
- State v. GravelSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-12-31· cited 43×
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 33×
- State v. ElbertSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-05-04· cited 32×
- State v. TapplySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-27· cited 27×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-02-03· cited 25×
- State v. DamianoSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-04-13· cited 22×
- State v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-12-29· cited 20×
- State v. PlchSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-06-30· cited 20×
- State v. BeaupreSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-03-24· cited 18×
- State v. RoacheSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-07-15· cited 17×
- State v. CopelandSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-10-26· cited 15×
- State v. TinkhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-10-05· cited 14×
- State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-04-28· cited 12×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- People v. GrantNew York Court of Appeals· 1978-07-13· cited 162×
- Commonwealth v. WatkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-06-20· cited 126×
- Ochoa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-11-08· cited 93×
- Daniel John Maglio v. Arnold R. Jago, SuperintendentSixth Circuit· 1978-07-03· cited 68×
- State v. PhinneySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-02-28· cited 59×
- United States v. James Arthur Charlton, Franklin N. Jacek, A/K/A Frank Royce, James Francis SwartzSixth Circuit· 1977-12-07· cited 43×
- Government of the Canal Zone v. Godofredo Gomez v. (Ventura)Fifth Circuit· 1978-02-06· cited 23×
- State v. NoelSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-07-11· cited 15×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-10-31· cited 13×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1977-12-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.