Illinois Supreme Court· 9/29/1988
People v. Evans
Citations
- 530 N.E.2d 1360
- 125 Ill. 2d 50
- 125 Ill. Dec. 790
- 1988 Ill. LEXIS 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial judge at bench sentencing hearing presumed not to rely on counsel’s improper argument
- trial judge at bench sentencing hearing presumed not to rely on counsel's improper argument
- the defendant inquired if there was time to get the public defender, the officer replied that he would stop questioning and call one, and defendant stated “ ‘No, go ahead’ ”
- trial judge at bench sentencing hearing presumed not to rely on counsel's improper argument
- defendant’s statement that “[w]e can take time for [police] to get a [public defender], right?” was a vague and ambiguous reference that did not constitute an invocation of right to counsel
- empaneled jury had higher percentage of African Americans than the venire
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moran, Stamos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
155 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. KlinerIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 564×
- People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 421×
- People v. HudsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 390×
- People v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 387×
- People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 329×
- People v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 322×
- People v. PeeplesIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 304×
- People v. PaschIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-10-01· cited 295×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 286×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-09-29· cited 247×
- People v. HeardIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 246×
- People v. CloutierIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-10-21· cited 232×
- People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-10-15· cited 221×
- People v. CruzIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-07-14· cited 214×
- People v. RichardsonIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-02-17· cited 212×
- Floyd Richardson v. Michael LemkeSeventh Circuit· 2014-03-11· cited 204×
- People v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-21· cited 200×
- People v. McCauleyIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-12-22· cited 188×
- People v. KiddIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 184×
- People v. TerrellIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-31· cited 179×
Cites
104 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court· 1986-03-10· cited 3,339×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-09-25· cited 1,612×
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 1,244×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-10-01· cited 793×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 676×
- People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-04-18· cited 666×
- Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-03-08· cited 576×
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-12-15· cited 533×
- Garner v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1961-12-11· cited 486×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.