Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2/6/1985
State v. Benoit
Citations
- 126 N.H. 6
- 490 A.2d 295
- 1985 N.H. LEXIS 240
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the fact that the “door has been opened” does not permit all evidence to “pass through” because the doctrine is intended to prevent prejudice and is not to be subverted into a vehicle for the introduction of prejudice
- requiring juveniles to be advised of possibility of being tried as adult
- prior action for involuntary hospitalization no bar to action seeking same relief on facts which occurred after denial of first petition
- heightened totality of the circumstances review for juvenile waivers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brock, Douglas, Others
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Traylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-16· cited 375×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-25· cited 112×
- State v. PinderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 103×
- State v. CallahanTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-10-12· cited 87×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-06-20· cited 70×
- State v. LapointeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-16· cited 70×
- Ledbetter v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-13· cited 64×
- Marine v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-05-15· cited 62×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-03-20· cited 54×
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-02-26· cited 50×
- State v. GravelSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-12-31· cited 43×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-14· cited 40×
- People v. HanaMichigan Supreme Court· 1993-08-03· cited 39×
- State v. OukSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-05-13· cited 37×
- McIntyre v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-06-04· cited 32×
- Tingle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-04-05· cited 31×
- State v. WamalaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-04-17· cited 30×
- State v. TrammellNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-05-22· cited 29×
- State v. BrodeurSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-04-19· cited 29×
- State v. MacRaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-06· cited 26×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 352×
- Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1972-10-19· cited 175×
- State in Interest of DinoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-05-08· cited 164×
- United States v. Frank W. WinstonD.C. Circuit· 1971-06-30· cited 94×
- Irving Polcover v. Secretary of the TreasuryD.C. Circuit· 1973-05-11· cited 94×
- State v. GullingsOregon Supreme Court· 1966-07-14· cited 73×
- Louis West v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-09-05· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-17· cited 65×
- In re E. T. C.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-06-24· cited 60×
- State v. PhinneySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-02-28· cited 59×
- State v. LuomaWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. CainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-02-24· cited 51×
- State v. LoydSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-11-02· cited 45×
- State v. LohnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-09-15· cited 44×
- In Re StiffAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-10-17· cited 40×
- State v. LaClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-08-10· cited 33×
- State v. SmagulaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-08-29· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.