Wyoming Supreme Court· 4/28/1982
Daniel v. State
Citations
- 644 P.2d 172
- 1982 Wyo. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant said he would “ ‘probably like to have an attorney present’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rose, Raper, Thomas, Rooney, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-06-18· cited 256×
- Eaton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1990-09-21· cited 194×
- Schmunk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-02-13· cited 111×
- Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1984-06-06· cited 105×
- Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-10-19· cited 81×
- Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-12-05· cited 73×
- Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1987-05-08· cited 68×
- Dharminder Vir Sen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2013-04-24· cited 58×
- State v. MouldsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1983-12-06· cited 51×
- Wright v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1985-10-09· cited 46×
- Griffin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-01-21· cited 45×
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-04-01· cited 44×
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-04-16· cited 38×
- Cheatham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-05-15· cited 36×
- Eaton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-03-18· cited 34×
- Stamper v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-04-08· cited 33×
- Taylor v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 27×
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-03-15· cited 26×
- Hampel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-09-27· cited 25×
- Burk v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-03-10· cited 25×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court· 1979-04-24· cited 2,172×
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 1,729×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1981-05-18· cited 1,110×
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-12-07· cited 600×
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-08-17· cited 471×
- People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-02-28· cited 431×
- United States v. Gary MalcolmSecond Circuit· 1970-09-23· cited 169×
- People v. JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-09-17· cited 150×
- Vincent Francis McGee Jr. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1972-04-18· cited 107×
- United States v. John W. Hinckley, Jr. United States of America v. John W. Hinckley, JrD.C. Circuit· 1982-02-23· cited 106×
- People v. EnriquezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 103×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.