Skip to main content

Ochoa v. State

Citations

  • 573 S.W.2d 796
  • 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant = s remark about speaking with an attorney obligated the interviewing officer to cease the interrogation
  • holding that statement by the accused that he thought he ought to talk to an attorney before answering questions or signing anything was sufficient to invoke the right to counsel even though the request was not pressed
  • defendant’s indication in any manner that he wished to have a lawyer is sufficient to assert right
  • defendant told officers he would not sign anything until he talked to his lawyer
  • “[T]his Court must conclude that if [the defendant] in any manner indicated his desire to have a lawyer, the continued interrogation was a violation of his Miranda rights and the confession obtained therefrom is inadmissible.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Vollers, Dally, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.