State v. Chrisman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where legislation reducing the punishment became effective after the crime was committed but before sentencing, the new legislation applied
• holding that where legislation reducing the punishment for burglary became effective after the crime was committed but before sentencing, the new legislation applied
• interpreting the effect of Iowa Code sec- tion 714.3 and determining whether the single-larceny rule still applies
• interpreting the effect of Iowa Code sec- tion 714.3 and determining whether the single-larceny rule still applies
• “The language of the statute shows that section 4.13 was intended to give a defendant who had not yet been sentenced the benefit of a reduced punishment enacted after the commission of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).