Washington Supreme Court· 5/9/2002

State v. Jones

Citations

146 Wash. 2d 328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying automatic standing rule to defendant who challenged the search of a third party's purse
a defendant has no standing to challenge a search of an item he or she does not own unless the defendant is entitled to assert automatic standing
constructive possession requires a person have dominion and control over the item enabling its immediate conversion to actual possession
constructive possession requires a person have dominion and control over the item, enabling its immediate conversion to actual possession
a defendant has no standing to challenge a search of an item he does not own unless the defendant is entitled to assert automatic standing
a defendant has no standing to challenge a search of an item he or she does not own unless the defendant is entitled to assert automatic standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.