Skip to main content

State v. Jackson

Citations

  • 688 P.2d 136
  • 102 Wash. 2d 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Washington uses the Augilar-Spinelli test to evaluate informants' tips
  • rebutting the six propositions on which the United States Supreme Court justified its rejection of the Aguilar-Spinelli test
  • rebutting the six propositions on which the United States Supreme Court justified its rejection of the Aguilar-Spinelli test
  • rejecting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) and maintaining two-pronged Aguilar Spinelli [3] test for informant tips
  • noting that if a tip standing alone or partially corroborated, falls short of probable cause, it still has a place in law enforcement by prompting a police investigation or further investigatory work that establishes the requisite probable cause
  • rejecting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S. Ct. 2317, 76 L. Ed. 2d 527 (1983) and maintaining two-pronged Aguilar/Spinelli 21 test for informant tips

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosellini, Dimmick, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

160 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.