Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/7/2018
State v. Stavenjord
Citations
- 415 P.3d 1143
- 290 Or. App. 669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant was not prejudiced by a variance in the proof of the date of the crime where defendant argued she had an alibi for the date in the indictment, but not the date proved at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aoyagi, Dehoog, Egan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 123×
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court· 1960-04-20· cited 19×
- Walton Et Ux v. Denhart Et UxOregon Supreme Court· 1961-03-01· cited 12×
- State v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 11×
- State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-05-04· cited 10×
- State v. MorganOregon Supreme Court· 2017-02-16· cited 9×
- State v. DaugaardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-24· cited 8×
- State v. NealCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-05-22· cited 4×
- State v. HibbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-01-28· cited 2×
Other cases named State v. Stavenjord
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.