Court of Appeals of Oregon· 12/7/2005
State v. Holcomb
Citations
- 125 P.3d 22
- 203 Or. App. 35
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1561
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[TJaking a suspect’s identification and calling dispatch to conduct a warrant check constitutes a stop.”
- obtaining the defendant’s identification and retaining it while conducting a warrant check effected a stop
- rejecting the state’s argument that “a person’s recent drug use is sufficient, without more, to establish reasonable suspicion of present drug possession”
- “this case does not present the issue whether, or in what circumstances, ‘mere obtaining’ of identification can effect a stop”
- “track marks on defendant’s arm—indicating that she probably, almost certainly, used unlawful controlled substances” and evidence that defendant may have recently used drugs did not support reasonable inference that defendant currently possessed drugs
- the facts that the officer observed track marks on the defendant’s arms, saw the defendant “dancing” on the shoulder of the highway, and discovered that she was on probation did not amount to reasonable suspicion of possession of a controlled substance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-26· cited 29×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-03· cited 23×
- State v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 20×
- State v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-10· cited 17×
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 16×
- State v. KentoppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-08· cited 15×
- State v. SteffensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-27· cited 11×
- State v. SundermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-20· cited 10×
- State v. OllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 9×
- State v. HoldorfCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 8×
- State v. CohanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 3×
- State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-23· cited 3×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 3×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-13· cited 3×
- State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.