Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/12/2005
State v. Holcomb
Citations
- 121 P.3d 13
- 202 Or. App. 73
- 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that evidence of recent drug use did not support a reasonable inference that the defendant currently possessed drugs
- explaining that the state’s argument “would effectively sanction nonparticularized, status-based stops of habitual drug users. The law does not go so far.”
- “[TJaking a suspect’s identification and calling dispatch to conduct a warrant check constitutes a stop.”
- obtaining the defendant’s identification and retaining it while conducting a warrant check effected a stop
- rejecting the state’s argument that “a person’s recent drug use is sufficient, without more, to establish reasonable suspicion of present drug possession”
- the officer “concluded that [the defendant] was not under the influence of a controlled substance”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-26· cited 29×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-03· cited 23×
- State v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-25· cited 20×
- State v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-10· cited 17×
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 16×
- State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-12-07· cited 16×
- State v. KentoppCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-08· cited 15×
- State v. SteffensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-27· cited 11×
- State v. SundermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-20· cited 10×
- State v. OllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 9×
- State v. HoldorfCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 8×
- State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-23· cited 3×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 3×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-13· cited 3×
- State v. HeaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 1×
- State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-13· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court· 2005-07-15· cited 336×
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
- State v. EhretCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-02· cited 32×
- State v. JacobusOregon Supreme Court· 1993-12-30· cited 20×
- State v. SopiwnikCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.