Skip to main content

State v. Dennis

Citations

  • 250 Or. App. 732
  • 282 P.3d 955
  • 2012 WL 2405196
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • state has burden of proving that investigation of unrelated criminal matter during traffic stop occurred during unavoidable lull in investigation of the traffic stop
  • officer unlawfully extends a traffic stop if the officer ceases to process the citation and instead, without justification, begins making inquiries unrelated to the traffic stop
  • restating the \unavoidable lull\ rule from State v. Rodgers
  • \regardless of the length of the extension\
  • applying the “unavoidable lull” analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.