Skip to main content

State v. McGee

Citations

  • 255 Or. App. 460
  • 297 P.3d 531
  • 2013 WL 707977
  • 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that 26-day delay that a single motion to suppress evidence was under advisement was reasonable
  • holding that, when a defendant files motions that require pretrial resolution, the defendant is deemed to have applied for or consented to a reasonable period of delay to consider and decide the motion
  • concluding that, “by filing a motion requiring pretrial delay, a defendant applies for or consents to delay for purposes of [former] ORS 135.747,” but “application or consent is not for unlimited delay, only reasonable delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.