State v. Burleson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that materiality is an element of the offense of making false statement to a government agency and must be submitted to the jury
• holding that the materiality of a false statement is a matter for the jury to decide
• holding that the materiality of a false statement is a matter for the jury to decide
• holding that materiality is an element of perjury and thus a question for the consideration of the jury
• holding that materiality element of fraud, long decided as question of law by courts, was question of fact that had to be submitted to jury
• holding that a jury must decide whether a false statement under § 1001 is “material”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).