Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/23/2010

State v. Davis

Citations

237 P.3d 835
236 Or. App. 99
2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

calculating delay for speedy trial purposes starting with date of the initial information
calculating delay for speedy trial purposes starting with date of the initial information
using date of initial information as starting point for calculating delay for speedy trial purposes and reasoning that there “was no dismissal of any information in this case; the same information was continued with very slight changes, and the rule in Purdom does not apply”
“[T]he courts have often treated one year as a benchmark of sorts in misdemeanor cases in determining reasonableness of a delay under ORS 135.747.” (Internal quotation marks omitted; brackets in original.)
date of initial information used for calculation of speedy trial period because there was “no dismissal of any information in this case; the same information was continued with very slight changes, and the rule in Purdom does not apply”
“clock” ends with date of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sercombe, Brewer, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.