Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/30/2006

State v. Garcia

Citations

142 P.3d 501
207 Or. App. 438
2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that unjustified delay of 2.5 months out of the total delay of 14 months was reasonable
concluding that a delay of 14 months was longer than would ordinarily be expected
concluding that, although 14 months was longer than would be expected to bring the defendant to trial on two misdemeanor charges, the delay was not unreasonable for purposes of ORS 135.747
concluding that delay of 670 days, or over 22 months, was unreasonable, regardless of whether individual delays were justified, because that period was roughly equal to the two-year statute of limitations
explaining that, where trial court granted motion to dismiss, last date set for trial is ending point for analysis under former ORS 135.747
noting that 68-day delay caused by setover of trial date was reasonable, where one of the judges was ill and “older cases had priority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge, and Ortega, Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.