Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/14/1998
State v. Price
Citations
- 510 S.E.2d 215
- 333 S.C. 267
- 1998 S.C. LEXIS 173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the fact that the State affords procedural due process to a motorist prior to suspending a driver's license does not transform the suspension from a remedial sanction into a punitive one
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-08-09· cited 29×
- State v. BurnellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-03-24· cited 27×
- State v. IshamNebraska Supreme Court· 2001-04-26· cited 18×
- In Re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-15· cited 12×
- Ingram v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-05-25· cited 6×
- State v. CucciaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 5×
- Depsky v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2007-10-09· cited 4×
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-04-26· cited 2×
- McMaster v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-01-10· cited 1×
- Elephant, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-04-30
- Sanders v. SCDMVSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-09-02
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 2,208×
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 2,202×
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 1,233×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 150×
- State v. EaslerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-28· cited 91×
- Luk v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-27· cited 89×
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-01-10· cited 77×
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-10-18· cited 75×
- State v. McClendonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-01· cited 70×
- State v. HickamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-26· cited 70×
- State v. SavardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-06-06· cited 69×
- State v. ZerkelCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-07-28· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.