State v. Schrock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant is entitled to a hearing when he presents a colorable ineffective assistance claim
• holding court did not abuse its discretion in precluding cross-examination on an irrelevant issue
• noting statements regarding a defendant’s silence must be examined in context to determine if they unconstitutionally “support[] an unfavorable inference against the defendant.”
• characterizing the argument that a defendant’s statement was a lie as “a proper attack on defendant’s statement”
• characterizing argument that a defendant's 3 STATE v. WEBER Decision of the Court statement was a lie as \a proper attack on defendant's statement\
• absent objection to instruction, case should be reversed only when instructions as a whole mislead jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).