Detention of Marshall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the offender’s “reliance on Albrecht and In re Detention of Broten, 115 Wn. App. 252, 62 P.3d 514 (2003
• Marshall’s nonconsensual sex with a developmentally disabled woman who had a developmental age of 10 to 12 constituted an overt act
• alleged sexually violent predator with a history of child molestation and diagnosed with pedophilia raping a developmentally disabled woman
• expert determined Marshall suffered from paraphilia not otherwise specified (nonconsenting adults or rape-like behavior)
• trial court properly concluded that offense of communicating with a minor for immoral purposes was a recent overt act, although it is not a per se sexually violent offense
• expert determined Marshall suffered from paraphilia NOS (nonconsenting adults or rape-like behavior)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).