Washington Supreme Court· 5/1/1980

State v. Dailey

Citations

610 P.2d 357
93 Wash. 2d 454
1980 Wash. LEXIS 1289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing Ferree and concluding that it is the \written decision of a trial court [that] is considered the court's `ultimate understanding' of the issue presented.\
discussing Ferree and concluding that it is the “written decision of a trial court [that] is considered the court’s ‘ultimate understanding’ of the issue presented” (quoting Diel v. Beekman, 7 Wn. App. 139, 149, 499 P.2d 37 (1972))
written decision of a trial court is considered the court's ultimate understanding of the issue presented
court’s oral decision not binding unless incorporated into findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment
\'[G]ovemmental misconduct' need not be of an evil or dishonest nature; simple mismanagement is sufficient.\
court found that trial court's dismissal, while not specifically stated, was based on CrR 8.3(b) because the trial court's decision to dismiss was due to \numerous incidents of prosecutorial mismanagement\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stafford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.