Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/31/1986

State v. Anderson

Citations

723 P.2d 464
44 Wash. App. 644
1986 Wash. App. LEXIS 3175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State’s experts to testify about Anderson’s out-of-court statements to them because the statements were not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
stating that trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State’s experts to testify about Anderson’s out-of-court statements to them because the statements were not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
stating that trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the State's experts to testify about Anderson's out-of-court statements to them because the statements were not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
exclusion of defense’s expert witness testimony regarding defendant’s out-of-court statements was not an abuse of discretion
ER 705 is not “a mechanism for admitting otherwise inadmissible evidence as an explanation of the expert's opinion.”
exclusion of defense's expert witness testimony regarding defendant's out- of-court statements was not an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.