Skip to main content

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 100 Wash. App. 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Martinez, and holding that a victim may recover attorney fees incurred as a direct result of the crime for which restitution is being ordered
  • distinguishing Martinez, and holding that a victim may recover attorney fees incurred as a direct result of the crime for which restitution is being ordered
  • affirming restitution for investigative costs where “but for the embezzlement, the victim would not have incurred” the costs
  • upholding award for investigation expenses incurred in ascertaining the extent of defendant’s embezzlement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.