Skip to main content

State v. Martin

Citations

  • 686 P.2d 937
  • 101 N.M. 595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the cumulative error “doctrine cannot be invoked if no irregularities occurred or if the record as a whole demonstrates that a defendant received a fair trial” (citation omitted)
  • holding that the right to remain silent applies outside the context of interrogation, throughout the period of time between the receipt of Miranda warnings and the commencement of trial
  • holding that an appellate court may not consider 15 matters not of record
  • holding that an appellate court may not consider matters not of record
  • holding that an appellate court may not consider matters not of record
  • holding cumulative error requires reversal of conviction only when cumulative impact of errors was so prejudicial that defendant was deprived of fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Federici, Sosa, Riordan, Walters, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.