· 9/23/1981
State v. Chouinard
Citations
- 634 P.2d 680
- 96 N.M. 658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that there must be a “realistic basis, beyond extrapolated speculation, for supposing that availability of the lost evidence would have undercut the prosecution’s case”
- dismissal of charge may be required if State improperly destroys or loses evidence that may be helpful to defense
- discussing nondisclosure of evidence (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- articulating factors to be considered when evidence is lost
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Payne, Easley, Federici, Sosa, Riordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.