Skip to main content
· 9/23/1981

State v. Chouinard

Citations

  • 634 P.2d 680
  • 96 N.M. 658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that there must be a “realistic basis, beyond extrapolated speculation, for supposing that availability of the lost evidence would have undercut the prosecution’s case”
  • dismissal of charge may be required if State improperly destroys or loses evidence that may be helpful to defense
  • discussing nondisclosure of evidence (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • articulating factors to be considered when evidence is lost

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Payne, Easley, Federici, Sosa, Riordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.