Skip to main content

State v. Dorsey

Citations

  • 539 P.2d 204
  • 88 N.M. 184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring only that evidence establish: [1] qualifications of polygraph operator; [2] reliability of testing procedure; and [3] validity of tests made on the subject
  • requiring only that evidence establish: [1] qualifications of polygraph operator; [2] reliability of testing procedure; and [3] validity of tests made on the subject
  • suggesting the Rules of Evidence should not be applied mechanistically to defeat their purpose
  • prerequisite to admission of polygraph evidence is showing of validity of test made on subject
  • state supreme court held that polygraph test results would be admissible when the trial court has evidence to support the expertise of the operator, the testing procedure, and the tests made on the subject
  • polygraph evidence admissible if polygraph expert is qualified as an expert, the testing procedure is shown reliable as approved by authorities in the field, and the tests made on the subject are shown to be valid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oman, McManus, Stephenson, Montoya, Sosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.