New Mexico Supreme Court· 3/9/1989

State v. Clark

Citations

772 P.2d 322
108 N.M. 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the 17 defendant must show that the trial court abused its discretion by denying withdrawal 18 of the plea
stating that failure to object to improper testimony or argument generally bars review on appeal
holding that this Court will not issue advisory opinions
stating defendant believed he could not let his rape victim go “because that would be the end for him”
doctrine of fundamental error has no application in cases where the defendant by his own actions created the error
“Generally, failure to make a timely objection to allegedly improper testimony or argument bars review of the issue on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scarborough, Stowers, Baca, Sosa, Ransom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

116 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.