New Mexico Supreme Court· 1/14/1993

State v. Hernandez

Citations

846 P.2d 312
115 N.M. 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant must show “that but for counsel’s unprofessional error, the result of the proceeding would have been different” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
holding that the defendant was not 17 deprived of a potential avenue of defense when defense counsel adequately placed the 18 State’s evidence into question through cross-examination
stating that defendant has burden of proving that his attorney’s acts or omissions fell below standard of competency
noting that the appellate court does not 3 substitute its judgment for that of the factfinder
discussing that in a substantial evidence 4 review, the court “may not reweigh the evidence nor substitute [its] judgment for that 5 of the jury”
refusing to find ineffective assistance of counsel because the 4 “[d]efendant has failed to demonstrate that the potential witnesses were willing to 5 testify and would have given favorable evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Ransom, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.