Arizona Supreme Court· 12/6/1976
State v. Lee
Citations
- 559 P.2d 657
- 114 Ariz. 101
- 1976 Ariz. LEXIS 369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the proper procedure to prove prior convictions is to offer a certified copy of the conviction
- holding that a trial court cannot find a prior conviction for purposes of aggravating a sentence by taking judicial notice of a prior case in which the court had reviewed a presentenee report referring to the prior conviction
- proper procedure for proving prior convictions is to offer certified copy of conviction
- “The proper procedure to establish the prior conviction is for the state to offer in evidence a certified copy of the conviction ... and establish the defendant as the person to whom the document refers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court· 1978-04-14· cited 132×
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court· 1981-04-14· cited 126×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 108×
- State v. GreenawaltArizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-23· cited 107×
- Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1978-05-19· cited 102×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 92×
- State v. LujanArizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 80×
- State v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court· 1979-11-09· cited 79×
- State v. PandeliArizona Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 76×
- State v. RockwellArizona Supreme Court· 1989-06-08· cited 74×
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court· 2006-02-08· cited 67×
- State v. MoralesArizona Supreme Court· 2007-05-08· cited 56×
- State v. MarlowArizona Supreme Court· 1989-11-09· cited 53×
- State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-05-25· cited 52×
- State v. AvilaArizona Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 48×
- In re Sabino R.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-26· cited 46×
- State v. ConsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-07-22· cited 44×
- State v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 42×
- Dorador v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1978-01-11· cited 42×
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court· 1954-05-03· cited 774×
- Thomas Darrell Camp v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1969-06-26· cited 74×
- United States v. Kenneth Freeman, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1975-04-14· cited 59×
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court· 1976-11-05· cited 53×
- State v. AcostaArizona Supreme Court· 1966-07-13· cited 46×
- United States v. Alexander Marchand Lewis, A/K/A Alexander Lewis SidneyThird Circuit· 1973-01-10· cited 43×
- State v. ShingArizona Supreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 40×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 38×
- United States v. Frank J. ParkerNinth Circuit· 1970-06-18· cited 35×
- United States v. Luis Martin Haro-PortilloNinth Circuit· 1976-03-19· cited 35×
- Noah Grimes and Thomas Pearson v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-04-12· cited 33×
- United States v. Resley Grose, United States of America v. James Calvin EatonSeventh Circuit· 1976-03-22· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.