Skip to main content

State v. Morales

Citations

  • 157 P.3d 479
  • 215 Ariz. 59
  • 2007 Ariz. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when colloquy required by Rule 17.6 is not given, remand to determine prejudice is not required if record contains sufficient evidence of prior convictions
  • holding that a remand was unnecessary because the certified copies of defendant’s prior convictions already in the record conclusively disproved prejudice resulting from the omission of a Rule 17.6 colloquy
  • noting that defendant must show that he would not have admitted the fact of the prior conviction had the trial court conducted the proper colloquy
  • noting that it would be pointless to remand for a hearing merely to have the defendant admit his convictions again
  • stating that resentencing was unwarranted when prior conviction documents were admitted during a pretrial hearing and no one has challenged the authenticity of those documents
  • finding that a failure to conduct a colloquy pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 17.6 constitutes fundamental error because “a waiver of constitutional rights must be voluntary and intelligent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bales, McGregor, Berch, Ryan, Hurwitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.