Arizona Supreme Court· 4/21/1980

State v. Gretzler

Citations

612 P.2d 1023
126 Ariz. 60
1980 Ariz. LEXIS 207

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[t]estimony concerning intoxication should be limited to the time of the crime for which the defendant is being tried”
stating that \[t]estimony concerning intoxication should be limited to the time of the crime for which the defendant is being tried\
instructing the jury to consider the testimony of an interested witness with skepticism is an impermissible comment on the evidence
denying motion to strike where “testimony was probative of several links in the chain of events leading from the kidnapping . . . to the murder . . .”
offenses arising out of defendant’s effort to leave Tucson without police detection were properly consolidated
offenses arising out of defendant's effort to leave Tucson without police detection were properly consolidated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Hays, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

97 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.