Arizona Supreme Court· 6/8/1989

State v. Rockwell

Citations

775 P.2d 1069
161 Ariz. 5
36 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
1989 Ariz. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where a witness was eliminated to facilitate the theft, “the murder was part and parcel of the robbery”
holding that where a witness was eliminated to facilitate the theft, \the murder was part and parcel of the robbery\
holding that if a witness was eliminated to facilitate the theft, “the murder was part and parcel of the robbery”
holding that if a witness was eliminated to facilitate the theft, \the murder was part and parcel of the robbery\
holding that the prosecutor was entitled to ask defendant’s character witnesses, who attested to defendant’s untruthfulness and propensity “to fabricate stories, of criminal exploits,” whether he had boasted of two crimes that he had in fact committed
holding unsolicited remark that defendant “started being rough with me” did not constitute fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Holohan, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.