State v. Lane

Citations

• 202 N.E.3d 45
• 2022 Ohio 3775

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's possession-of-drugs convictions and associated firearm specifications are supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant-appellant's possession-of-drugs convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to remove a juror who disclosed a relationship with a member of defendant-appellant's family. Plaintiff-appellee's improper comments during closing statements do not constitute plain error. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by issuing a jury instruction on complicity. Plaintiff-appellee did not breach an enforceable plea agreement. Defendant-appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Defendant-appellant's sentences are neither unsupported by the record nor contrary to law.