Skip to main content

State v. Boyd

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 3248

Syllabus

Duhart. The trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress. The convictions were based on sufficient evidence and are not against the manifest weight. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting text message evidence or in giving a complicity instruction.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.