State v. Gochenour
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4414
Syllabus
Sentencing Factors; R.C. 2929.11; R.C. 2929.12; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider the application of the sentencing factors. Counsel was not ineffective for not raising all the factors that possibly could have been raised in mitigation when the trial court indicated it had considered those factors. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise a letter written to the court by the defendant's mother when there was no indication counsel even knew it existed.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 325×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-20· cited 73×
- State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-24· cited 17×
- State v. PaxsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.