State v. Barnett
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 678
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in ordering the defendant-appellant to pay court-appointed counsel fees without holding a hearing on the issue however, the trial court did err when it taxed court-appointed counsel fees as costs in the criminal case. Because the defendant-appellant's sentence is within the statutory sentencing range and because the trial court considered the purposes and principles of felony sentencing and the R.C. 2929.12 factors, the sentence is not contrary to law.
Judges: Waldick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-15· cited 137×
- State v. NobleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 88×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-13· cited 80×
- State v. SaldanaOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-25· cited 53×
- State v. Taylor (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-22· cited 40×
- State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-24· cited 17×
- State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.