Skip to main content

State v. Barnett

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 678

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in ordering the defendant-appellant to pay court-appointed counsel fees without holding a hearing on the issue however, the trial court did err when it taxed court-appointed counsel fees as costs in the criminal case. Because the defendant-appellant's sentence is within the statutory sentencing range and because the trial court considered the purposes and principles of felony sentencing and the R.C. 2929.12 factors, the sentence is not contrary to law.

Judges: Waldick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.