Skip to main content

State v. Lane

Citations

  • 838 S.E.2d 808
  • 308 Ga. 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Georgia courts considering whether a criminal defendant is entitled to a new trial should consider collectively the prejudicial effect of trial court errors”
  • holding that the prejudicial effect of multiple evidentiary errors must be considered cumulatively
  • holding that at least as to evidentiary issues, this Court must “consider collectively the prejudicial effect, if any, of trial court errors, along with the prejudice caused by any deficient performance of counsel”
  • specifying that “a defendant who wishes to take advantage of the [cumulative- error rule] should explain to the reviewing court just how he was prejudiced by the cumulative effect of multiple errors”
  • comparing standard for prejudice from deficient performance by counsel with standard for nonconstitutional harmless error
  • rejecting contention that trial court abused its discretion by not submitting to the jury special interrogatories on mental capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

234 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

146 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.