State v. Biscotti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court lacked good cause to extend the deadline as a matter of law
• noting that the text of ORS 137.106 as it existed before the 2013 amendments “plainly establishes a 90-day deadline for the issuance of a supplemental judgment order- ing restitution”
• summarizing cases interpreting “good cause” as used in various statutes, including ORS 135.775 and ORS 135.765(2)(a) (emphasis omitted)
• delay resulting from “miscommunication” after prosecutor left office, causing case to “[fall] through the cracks,” did not constitute good cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).