Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/10/2008

State v. Spicer

Citations

193 P.3d 62
222 Or. App. 215
2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[T]he state has not shown that defendant could not reasonably have been brought to trial within a substantially shorter cumulative period of time.”
17.25 months of unconsented delay in bringing defendant to trial on felony charges, with nine months unjustified, held unreasonable
“If the defendant did not apply for or consent to a delay, that delay is part of the period included in the statutory calculation of reasonableness.”
“If the defendant did not apply for or consent to a delay, that delay is part of the period included in the statutory calculation of reasonableness.”
“[T]he issue under ORS 135.747 is not whether the state caused a delay hut whether the trial was ‘postponed upon the application of the defendant or by the consent of the defendant.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Rosenblum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.