Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/19/2015

State v. Johnson

Citations

413 S.C. 458
776 S.E.2d 367
2015 S.C. LEXIS 302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting \[c]redibility findings are treated as factual findings\ and holding, in spite of 252 (2001
noting \[c]redibility findings are treated as factual findings\ and holding, in spite of 252 (2001
stating the admission or exclusion of evidence is left to the discretion of the trial judge and \will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion\
stating a trial court must make two inquiries when considering a defendant's invocation of his or her right to counsel: (1) whether \the accused actually invoked his right to counsel\ and (2
\[I]t is well-established under South Carolina law that credibility determinations are entitled to great deference.\
\[I]t is well-established under South Carolina law that credibility determinations are entitled to great deference.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty, Hearn, Kittredge, Pleicones, Toal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.