Skip to main content
· 7/23/2001

State v. Wannamaker

Citations

  • 552 S.E.2d 284
  • 346 S.C. 495
  • 2001 S.C. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an in limine motion to suppress drugs must be renewed at the time the drugs are admitted into evidence
  • holding a ruling in limine is not final and that unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling procured, the issue is not preserved for review
  • holding to preserve an issue regarding the admissibility of evidence, a contemporaneous objection must be made and failure to object when evidence is offered constitutes a waiver of the right to have the issue considered on appeal
  • holding issue of whether court erred in failing to suppress defendant’s custodial statement was not preserved despite the court’s denial of suppression motion where defendant failed to make contemporaneous objection when the statement was read into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.