Skip to main content

State v. Green

Syllabus

Tappia Dangelo Green appeals from his convictions for armed robbery, kidnapping, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, asserting the trial court erred in allowing irrelevant testimony, allowing evidence of his post-arrest silence in violation of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), and failing to enforce its initial decision to grant a mistrial when a juror was unable to participate in deliberations due to a medical condition and asked to be relieved. We affirm.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.