Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/24/1995

State v. Kelley

Citations

460 S.E.2d 368
319 S.C. 173
1995 S.C. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that trial judge has considerable latitude in ruling on admissibility of evidence and his rulings will not be disturbed absent showing of probable prejudice
stating that trial judge has considerable latitude in ruling on admissibility of evidence and his rulings will not be disturbed absent showing of probable prejudice
noting that when guilt is conclusively proven by competent evidence, such that no other rational conclusion could be reached, this Court will not set aside conviction for insubstantial errors not affecting result
noting that when guilt is conclusively proven by competent evidence, such that no other rational conclusion could be reached, this Court will not set aside the conviction for insubstantial errors not affecting result
finding charts, photographs, and a video depicting the excess nature of the killing were both relevant and probative to the issue of malice
stating the trial court has “considerable latitude in ruling on admissibility of evidence and his rulings will not be disturbed absent showing of probable prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.