Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/23/1990

State v. Johnson

Citations

395 S.E.2d 167
302 S.C. 243
1990 S.C. LEXIS 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an affidavit which stated that the informant had seen drugs in the defendant’s home in the last seventy-two hours was a ‘bare bones’ affidavit and therefore the good-faith exception could not be employed to validate the warrant
holding that an affidavit which stated that the informant had seen drugs in the defendant's home in the last seventy-two hours was a `bare bones' affidavit and therefore the good-faith exception could not be employed to validate the warrant
following explanations were found to be racially neutral and sufficient to withstand Batson inquiry: (1) juror’s neighbor had been arrested by one of the officers involved in the case; (2
composition of the jury panel is a factor that may be considered when determining whether a party engaged in purposeful discrimination
composition of the jury panel is a factor that may be considered when determining whether a party engaged in purposeful discrimination
composition of the jury panel is a factor that may be considered when determining whether a party engaged in purposeful discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.