Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/12/1987
State v. McKnight
Citations
- 352 S.E.2d 471
- 291 S.C. 110
- 1987 S.C. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a search warrant was defective for failure to comply with a statute that enhanced constitutional requirement that search warrants be “supported by oath or affirmation”
- holding that oral sworn statements were not sufficient where search warrant statute required affidavit
- holding that oral sworn statements were not sufficient where search warrant statute required affidavit
- noting that a “sworn, oral statement may be sufficient to satisfy the requirement for oath or affirmation”
- holding when the State is unable to demonstrate a good-faith attempt to comply with the statute authorizing the issuance, execution and return of search warrants, S.C. Code Ann. § 17-13-140, exclusion is the proper remedy
- refusing to apply the good faith exception where the officers failed to attempt to comply in good faith to the affidavit requirements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 298×
- State v. GuzmanIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-11-05· cited 152×
- People v. GoldstonMichigan Supreme Court· 2004-07-15· cited 132×
- United States v. Charles E. ClyburnFourth Circuit· 1994-05-18· cited 100×
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-12-21· cited 57×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-07-23· cited 46×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-21· cited 39×
- State v. CraneSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-09-26· cited 33×
- State v. AsburySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-11-10· cited 28×
- State v. MollisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-30· cited 27×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-11-12· cited 24×
- State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 22×
- State v. CovertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-04-13· cited 16×
- State v. CovertCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 15×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-05-29· cited 15×
- State v. BowieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-28· cited 15×
- State v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-27· cited 14×
- State v. GilmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-11-09· cited 12×
- State v. GentileCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-08· cited 11×
- State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-21· cited 10×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,879×
- Combs v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 137×
- State v. SachsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-05-27· cited 52×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-22· cited 30×
- State v. YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-07-31· cited 20×
- Davis v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-06-10· cited 18×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-05-12· cited 12×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-09· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.