State v. Sampson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an unappealed ruling is the law of the case and, standing alone, may be a sufficient basis to affirm a defendant’s conviction
• holding unappealed ruling is the law of the case
• unchallenged rulings excluding evidence were law of the case and were sufficient basis for affirmance
• unappealed ruling is the law of the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 35×
• State v. Fairey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 15×
• Rhoad v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 14×
• State v. Sosbee
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-11-13· cited 6×
• State v. Frey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-01-25· cited 5×
• State v. Clifford
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• Franks v. Delaware
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-07-23· cited 46×
• State v. Creech
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-31· cited 27×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-02-21· cited 19×
• State v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-13· cited 10×
• Burton v. County of Abbeville
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 9×
• Mac Papers, Inc. v. Genesis Press, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-04-03· cited 3×